Let Gee Be Gee – The Gee Chronicles
Dec 012002
 

N/S Vul
IMPs
Dealer: South
Lead: DK

fer-lema
S K Q 7 6 5
H A K Q 9 8 3
D
C A 8
macondo
S J 9 4
H 6 4
D A K Q 10 5
C 7 5 4
[W - E] wildcats
S 8
H J 10 7 5 2
D 9 8 4 3 2
C 10 9
Maestro
S A 10 3 2
H
D J 7 6
C K Q J 6 3 2
West

1 D
Pass
Pass
Pass

North

2 D
6 D
7 C

East

5 D
Pass
Pass

South
1 C
6 C
6 S
Pass

 

Chronicles readers are surely familiar by now with the difficult question of WWGD (What Would Gee Do?). Today we investigate two related and equally abstruse matters, HWGP (How Would Gee Play?) and WWGSATH (What Would Gee Say After The Hand?).

Here the auction is interesting. North’s 2D bid normally shows, in 2/1, a limit club raise or better, but North has few other forcing bids at his disposal. Gee makes a fine 6C bid over East’s 5D sac, reasoning that his partner is likely void in diamonds and any spade values give them a decent play for slam.

North makes another excellent bid of 6D, describing his major suit moose and diamond void perfectly. Gee thinks it over and bids 6S, and North, uncertain whether this is a cue or a suit, signs off in the club grand, against which West leads the DK.

Now we pause and ask, How Would Gee Play? Trump break, spades are 3-1: is there any conceivable way to go down?

Of course there is. Gee ruffs the opening diamond low in dummy, cashes the CA, both defenders following, and plays top hearts. One round of hearts, discarding a diamond; two rounds of hearts, discarding a diamond; three rounds of hearts, ruffing with the trump 6, overruffed with the 7, down one.

What Would Gee Say After The Hand? “I can be really stupid sometimes,” says Gee. (I would like to report that no spec made the obvious rejoinder. Sadly, I am unable to do so.) “I was afraid of getting a spade ruffed,” he continues.

Let’s try something tougher:

E/W Vul
IMPs
Dealer: North
Lead: C4

ynh
S Q 10 8 6 4
H J 6 2
D K
C J 9 6 4
Maestro
S A K 5 2
H K 10 7
D J 2
C A K 10 5
[W - E] wilcoxjj
S 7
H A 8 5
D A Q 7 5 4 3
C Q 7 2
mas
S J 9 3
H Q 9 4 3
D 10 9 8 6
C 8 3
West

1 S
4NT
6NT

North
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
East
1 D
2 D
5 S
Pass
South
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass

 

Gee and partner reach an excellent 6NT contract after a normal auction. Of course the hand is cold. It makes on any 3-2 diamond break, and declarer can protect against a stiff king (though no other 4-1 break), by playing the diamond ace first. On the actual layout the ace drops the stiff king, mas gets his diamond winner and then no mas for the defense.

The question is, how is it possible to go down not one, not two, but three tricks after a low club lead? Gee makes the first key play by winning trick 1 with the king instead of the 10, although in fairness this would ordinarily not matter because E/W need five diamond tricks to make anyway. He promptly forgoes the safety play by leading the DJ, discovering the bad news when North discards a spade on the second round of diamonds.

Now sure, he can still go down 1 by conceding two diamond tricks. Let’s let Gee be Gee instead. First he ducks a heart into North’s jack: one trick for the defense. North returns a club, on which Gee makes a second Magoo play by winning the queen in dummy, and leading a third round of clubs, inserting the ten when South shows out: two tricks for the defense. North shifts to hearts, as good as anything else. Gee wins the heart king, cashes the club ace and his remaining major suit winners, and concedes a diamond and a spade at the end for the defense’s third and fourth tricks.

What Would Gee Say After The Hand? “The distribution,” he would say, “was very unfriendly that time.”

  One Response to “Let Gee Be Gee”

  1.  

    Gee states that he “was afraid of getting a spade ruffed.” Let’s examine this statement further to see what other lessons we can learn from the master. To start with, let’s assume, as Gee did, that spades are 4-0. What secondary assumptions can we then draw? A count of winners reveals 13: 3 spades, 3 hearts, one diamond ruff, and 6 clubs. Gee’s immediate challenge, after ruffing the diamond lead and cashing the trump ace, was to find a safe way back to his hand to draw the remaining trumps and claim his grand slam. Assuming spades are 4-0 (and for the moment we will suspend discussion about who has the void), the only other way back to hand, it would appear to the STCP, is by ruffing a heart. But wait! We have not considered the possibility of a bad break in hearts. If hearts are 0-7, there is the danger of getting overruffed by West or of promoting a trump trick in West’s hand if we ruff high. What can we do about that? We can of course draw tertiary assumptions: if hearts are 0-7 with East and diamonds are 5-5 on the auction, then 4 spades can only be with West. Assuming, therefore, that West is 4=0=5=4 and East 0=7=5=1, the solution to Gee’s problem is clear: after cashing the club ace, East will be left with no more trumps with which he could ruff a spade and the correct card to play from dummy is a spade! This is a variation on the Dentist’s Coup where “safe” cards are removed from a defender before making a key play. Since in our scenario a “dangerous” card is removed, let’s term this play the Root Canal Coup. So did our hero execute this elegant play at the table? No he did not. And why? Because Gee saw further into the hand. He allowed for the possibility of 5-0 trumps and drew what may have been bridge’s first quaternary assumption: If spades are 4-0 and clubs 0-5 (else there is no hope) then the distribution to guard against is: 4=5=4=0 with West opposite 0=2=6=5 with East. Accordingly, declarer cashes the two top hearts and continues with the third top heart to induce an injudicious ruff by East (with a low trump of course) whereupon declarer overruffs, crosses to dummy’s club ace, ruffs (or overruffs) a heart back to hand, and draws trumps the last of which squeezes West in the majors! This was obviously the distribution and ending Gee envisioned and we should all be thankful that the hand has been recorded for posterity. That he did not take the time to dot the i’s and cross the t’s for us was an oversight and explains his “stupid” comment — he forgot we would not be able to grasp the dangers of this deal as quickly as he had. One can merely marvel.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>