E/W Vul
IMPs
Dealer: South
Lead: A
maher A K 9 7 Q 10 10 9 6 K 10 9 4 |
||
dickfu 2 7 6 5 4 J 7 Q J 6 5 3 2 |
Maestro J 10 6 5 A J 9 3 2 5 2 A 7 |
|
egypt1 Q 8 4 3 K 8 A K Q 8 4 3 8 |
West
Pass |
North
1 |
East
2 |
South 1 3 Pass Pass Pass |
Our series in hand evaluation — it seems I’m writing a series after all — continues. Today we see the importance of evaluating your hand in context. Vulnerability, type of scoring — these all count in expert hand evaluation, and lesser players often overlook them.
Gee, East, ventures a vulnerable overcall with an eight-loser hand and both the North and South hands unlimited. A shyer player might think twice; but Gee has remarked in another context on the importance of daring, and one can certainly not fault him for cowardice here. South’s 14 HCP are looking a great deal better on this bidding, with solid diamonds, 4-card support, a stiff, and the HK favorably placed, and he jumps to 3S, which his partner raises to game.
Back we come to Gee, who holds three defensive tricks. It is difficult to imagine, on the auction, that his partner holds more than one. With N/S not vulnerable, at IMPs, a double stands to gain 50 points. Or so the ordinary player might reason. Gee doubles. North, who holds a full opener himself and has heard his partner jump raise his suit, redoubles, as one might expect.
This faces Gee’s partner, who holds the zero defensive tricks that one might expect, with the attractive choice of losing the rarely-seen 880 (4S is cold on any defense) or taking the sacrifice in 5H. He takes the sac, which turns out to be a key decision.
South cashes two diamonds and shifts to a spade. North wins the SK and switches to trump. Gee rises with the ace and plays another trump. Trump break, but clubs don’t, and Gee is stuck with a spade loser at the end for down 3. But -800 beats -880, and an expert who would double 4S certainly appreciates the significance of saving 80 points at IMPs.
I imagine Volume II of “Bridge is a Conversation” will include the more advanced conversation topics of “listening” and “observing.” Volume II might shed light on conversing (bidding) ONLY when necessary or appropriate, e.g., considering colors and the prior auction before doubling a strongly bid 4S contract. This bridge hand has all the markings of being deliberately devised just to illustrate the need for “Bridge Is A Conversation – Volume II.” Perhaps Gee has an elaborate scheme to begin promotion of his next e-book by weaving a need for it throughout the Gee Chronicles. I applaud Gee’s personal sacrifice in the pursuit of helping the non-experts once again better understand what not to do.
In a generous vein, and solely for the sake of theoretical discussion, let us give the Gee hand a slightly more representative holding for the double – say: JT98x AJ9xx x Ax. Whatever regrets would that hand hold when the opposition converted to 4NT, taking 3 S’s, 1H, and 6 D’s? Some conversations, apparently, are better left unspoken.